How can there be an end to the political recruitment center set up by the judiciary? The court has lost justice. Is it necessary to buy justice without becoming a cadre of any political party in Nepal? How does public trust in the court increase now? It is in the history of this government that so much interference in the judiciary has taken place. This government made the court a political recruitment center. The verdict of Cholendra Shamsher JBR on the assassin Ranjan Koirala has also shattered the strong wall of trust of the citizens towards the court. Did JBR’s decision only undermine public confidence in the judiciary? The court has repeatedly closed the gap of justice in this way. There is a similarity between squeezing the wife’s throat and squeezing the court’s throat. Their ideas, categories, and theories match. This is the result of such thinking. It is difficult for the general public to get justice in Nepal. It’s very difficult. This is what the facts show. The Nepali people have no faith in the judiciary.
This government made the court a political recruitment center.
What was the wisdom of Chief Justice JBR and another judge, Tej Bahadur KC, in reducing the sentence of Koirala? who was serving a life sentence for murdering his own wife, by more than half? How did the Holy Court become a place of business? Conscience is nowhere to be seen in this decision. The decision of the bench to release him has not only attacked the faith of the people. The court has been converted into commercial customs. Both Prime Minister KP Oli and Deuba are helping the court to become a political recruitment center. It is difficult for people to get justice without resolving this situation. How did Rajan Koirala, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for killing his wife Geeta Dhakal nine years ago, be released from jail? It is a matter of interest and curiosity in the common man. On what basis did the court commute his sentence?
From the outside, the Chief Justice has a hand in this decision, but internally, the people of the government have a hand. The Chief Justice now appears to be under pressure. The Chief Justice has not released Ranjan Koirala from jail under the direction of the people of the government. This is not the only decision of Cholendra Shamsher. Those in government have a hand in this decision. Which may just not come out. Behind the scenes is the hand of the former UML. When will the KP Oli government stop political interference in the judiciary? The present court is becoming a puppet of the KP government. The people are watching. Justice is dying in the courts. On the other hand, political interference is on the rise. Excessive political interference and corruption are the reasons behind the slow pace of the court. When a respected court starts selling justice for money, the country will no longer exist.
The present court is becoming a puppet of the KP government.
Now let’s talk about the system. Let’s talk about the basic policies, rules, and principles of democracy. The three pillars of democracy are the executive, the judiciary, and the legislature. But how can the rule of law survive if the executive continues to interfere in the judiciary? In a democracy, we have even done the disgusting thing of making the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Khil Raj Regmi, the head of the government. If not, why can’t the government remove the Chief Justice by impeachment? What a precedent it will set for the judiciary tomorrow. If this can be done by the head of the judiciary of the country, then the efficiency of the judiciary can be questioned again and again. This is not a good sign for the country. It is a mockery of the rule of law. Due to the continuous political interference in the judiciary, the judiciary itself was destroyed. This is not a good sign for the country.
This is not a good sign for the country.
The decision of Cholendra Shamsher JBR and his joint bench has shaken Nepal’s judiciary. How the murder of a murderer who bought petrol in advance and backed up in a car suddenly turned into a future. Second, how can the future be considered in the case of his own confession of murder? This was the result of a deliberate and deliberate conspiracy by Ranjan Koirala. If the principle of the future is applied in all cases while administering justice in the coming days, how will justice rise in the country? Nepal is ahead in the world in impunity. There is still a practice of not committing any crime on the basis of access to politics. Which applies to those who are close to power and authority. No one knows how long the general public will have to suffer for justice. How to advocate such a state as a legal state in the coming days? Under no circumstances will the Nepali people accept this. They are not even forced to accept. If this happens, there will be great dissatisfaction in the country. Which could lead to a major uprising? If that happens then this system can change. This is not a good sign for the judiciary to abandon its religion.
Why did a father kill his mother if he knew that minor sons needed guardianship? If a senior police officer could commit murder up to this point, there would be no better place for him than a lifelong prison. What he was released for, the scenes of his release foretold the future. No matter what the argument is, there is no need to prove that the Chief Justice’s assassin has a strong connection with him. It may be even more unfortunate if such questions are raised about the performance of the court and if it is tried to be avoided as a defamation of the court. If the general public is reluctant to speak out against this, the rule of law can never be established in the country. People need to wake up and speak at such times. The perpetrator must be punished again under any circumstances. No excuse can be given for such heinous crimes. It has once bowed the head of the country. With this decision, the court has not only cleared the gap of Geeta Dhakal but also the gap of the entire judiciary. How long is it still? What is this democracy for if the general public is not listened to even in a democracy? Now the judiciary and for whom is this law? The questions are many. But the Nepali people have not got it from anywhere.
People need to wake up and speak at such times.
After gathering all the evidence, the esteemed court has found him guilty. On the same basis, how can the offender who is being punished be exempted? If the court does not respect the law, how much chaos will increase in the country in the coming days? How successful democracy depends on how independent the judiciary is. The more political interference in the judiciary, the weaker democracy becomes. This has been proven around the world. If the KP Oli government has no hand in this case, then the government should have the wisdom to file an impeachment. If not, it is the hand of the people in the government from behind the curtain. In Nepal, as political tensions escalate, the Supreme Court is somehow used. This is a very sad aspect. It does not strengthen democracy. There is no better place in the world than life imprisonment for a man who can kill his own wife to pieces. Why didn’t the Supreme Court judges understand this? The Nepali people have been repeatedly asking the same question to the Chief Justice and the government of Nepal.
Comment